Bombay is again witness to a slugfest over trivia. The highhandedness of Bal Thackeray
and his goons are very much in evidence in the destruction of posters of Shahrukh Khan’s
forthcoming movie ‘My name is Khan’. They’ve said that they will not allow the screening of the film because the actor had hit out against the boycott of Pakistani players in the recently concluded IPL auction. On a personal level, I too endorse his views on the issue because no country can be humiliated in this manner and especially so when sporting events are involved. While one accepts the fact that Pakistan has tried every trick in its repertoire to discomfort India, we do not have to stoop to their levels. But who gave the right to Thackeray to take law into his hands?
The Maharashtra government is a mute bystander watching the fun. How long can one man take the state to ransom? Doesn’t an individual have the right to freedom of speech as enshrined in the constitution of this country? And can this goon say anything and everything and get away with murder? Some of the articles that he writes in his party mouthpiece ‘Samna’ are explosive and full of venom. Since the time of his arrival(?) in the early sixties, questioning the right of the South Indians coming to work in Bombay, he has never looked back as he’d the patronization of politicians across the spectrum (And the biggest irony was that his chief fund provider then was none other than Vyjayantimala, the actress!).
And having said this, it’s my gut feeling that Shahrukh and Thackeray will eventually patch up – it’s just a matter of time – pat each others’ backs and proclaim that each has great love and respect for the other etc, etc. If that be the outcome, why is this pantomime being played? Who, out of the two, needs more publicity and media space? And as always, we, the gullible public, end up being on the receiving end.
and his goons are very much in evidence in the destruction of posters of Shahrukh Khan’s
forthcoming movie ‘My name is Khan’. They’ve said that they will not allow the screening of the film because the actor had hit out against the boycott of Pakistani players in the recently concluded IPL auction. On a personal level, I too endorse his views on the issue because no country can be humiliated in this manner and especially so when sporting events are involved. While one accepts the fact that Pakistan has tried every trick in its repertoire to discomfort India, we do not have to stoop to their levels. But who gave the right to Thackeray to take law into his hands?
The Maharashtra government is a mute bystander watching the fun. How long can one man take the state to ransom? Doesn’t an individual have the right to freedom of speech as enshrined in the constitution of this country? And can this goon say anything and everything and get away with murder? Some of the articles that he writes in his party mouthpiece ‘Samna’ are explosive and full of venom. Since the time of his arrival(?) in the early sixties, questioning the right of the South Indians coming to work in Bombay, he has never looked back as he’d the patronization of politicians across the spectrum (And the biggest irony was that his chief fund provider then was none other than Vyjayantimala, the actress!).
And having said this, it’s my gut feeling that Shahrukh and Thackeray will eventually patch up – it’s just a matter of time – pat each others’ backs and proclaim that each has great love and respect for the other etc, etc. If that be the outcome, why is this pantomime being played? Who, out of the two, needs more publicity and media space? And as always, we, the gullible public, end up being on the receiving end.